...From 100%
As a leader in corporate organizations, the military and small businesses, this was a frequent reminder to my organization we all have a role to play in our organization’s success. It also reminded them of the importance of showing up every day with everything they have to give, not just show up. Said differently, I was promoting full employee engagement by everyone in the organization. As we reviewed the four key elements of the Total Leadership Model these previous four months, it all centers on the level of engagement by employees, associates and volunteers who create the moments of truth and points of connection between the organization and those who bring you business.
Last month I referenced the results of a recent Gallup Poll survey indicating in average performing organizations, only 33% of employees are engaged in the business. This compared to world-class organizations where the exact opposite is true and 67% of the organization engaged in the business. In addition, in average performing organizations, 18% of employees were actively disengaged. This means that only a third of the organization cares about the activities contributing directly to employee retention, productivity, customer satisfaction/engagement, safety and profitability; all measurable dimensions of organizational success. Improving employee engagement has a direct effect on customer loyalty. Last month I mentioned even a 5% increase in customer loyalty can improve profits by 25% up to 85% depending on industry.
But what if you are a small or medium sized business with few employees? Does this matter? How engaged are the employees of your larger customers, especially the ones who implement your services, purchase your products and pay your invoices? If they don’t care beyond the minimum, how does that affect your business? Employee engagement impacts every business, large or small!
And it all starts with leadership. Jack Welch, former CEO of General Electric once said, “Any company trying to compete…must figure out how to engage the mind of every employee.” We define organizational culture as the shared values, beliefs and actions that develop within an organization guiding the behavior of its members. Employee attitude is where it starts for leaders because it is attitude that drives behavior and it is behavior that drives the ability to achieve the desired results of the organization. The behavior observed by your customers, suppliers and other employees forms the ongoing perception of your organization and your business. As you understand the market’s perception of your business, are you getting 100% out of 100%?
Lead Well!
Showing posts with label Process Improvement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Process Improvement. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
If You Can’t Describe What You Do as a Process...
…You Don’t Know What You Are Doing.
These words from W. Edwards Deming, considered the godfather of organizational process improvement, are a great way to introduce the third element of the Total Leadership Model. To put it in perspective, we previously introduced Strategy as the foundation of the model and last month discussed Leadership Development as one of the two key supporting elements of the model. This month we look at Operational Improvement, the Process side of Total Leadership, as the other supporting element crucial to being an effective leader in today’s business environment.
Everything we do in our organization be it public, private, non-profit, large or small is a process. Everything we do has inherent interdependencies with what happens before during and after each task and function we execute. And because each task and function we execute has an outcome, it becomes a point in which we can measure the desired results of that task or function. In Dr. H. James Harrington’s book, Business Process Improvement he puts it this way:
• “Measurements are key.
• If you cannot measure it, you cannot control it.
• If you cannot control it, you cannot manage it.
• If you cannot manage it, you cannot improve it.
• It is as simple as that.”
At this point, there may be those of you who may be thinking this is great, but I don’t operate in the plant or in operations where our products are made. In truth more than half of the Operational Improvement opportunities are in the traditional “front office” functions such as Sales, Marketing, Finance and Human Resources. Or there may be those entrepreneurs who run small businesses who think this is great for larger companies, but does not apply to small businesses. In fact, missing these opportunities for Operational Improvement likely has a much greater financial impact as a percentage of revenue than in the larger companies. It’s akin to thinking gravity does not apply to you because you weigh less than twenty pounds. All processes have very real financial impacts if not producing their desired results!
Today’s leaders see this as an opportunity to truly understand what they do in the context of a global business environment constantly evolving through regulatory, economic and socio-cultural changes. As a leader it’s not enough to merely invest in people in the organization if you are not also willing to ensure the processes they use are optimized for success. So, describe what you do again?
Lead Well!
These words from W. Edwards Deming, considered the godfather of organizational process improvement, are a great way to introduce the third element of the Total Leadership Model. To put it in perspective, we previously introduced Strategy as the foundation of the model and last month discussed Leadership Development as one of the two key supporting elements of the model. This month we look at Operational Improvement, the Process side of Total Leadership, as the other supporting element crucial to being an effective leader in today’s business environment.
Everything we do in our organization be it public, private, non-profit, large or small is a process. Everything we do has inherent interdependencies with what happens before during and after each task and function we execute. And because each task and function we execute has an outcome, it becomes a point in which we can measure the desired results of that task or function. In Dr. H. James Harrington’s book, Business Process Improvement he puts it this way:
• “Measurements are key.
• If you cannot measure it, you cannot control it.
• If you cannot control it, you cannot manage it.
• If you cannot manage it, you cannot improve it.
• It is as simple as that.”
At this point, there may be those of you who may be thinking this is great, but I don’t operate in the plant or in operations where our products are made. In truth more than half of the Operational Improvement opportunities are in the traditional “front office” functions such as Sales, Marketing, Finance and Human Resources. Or there may be those entrepreneurs who run small businesses who think this is great for larger companies, but does not apply to small businesses. In fact, missing these opportunities for Operational Improvement likely has a much greater financial impact as a percentage of revenue than in the larger companies. It’s akin to thinking gravity does not apply to you because you weigh less than twenty pounds. All processes have very real financial impacts if not producing their desired results!
Today’s leaders see this as an opportunity to truly understand what they do in the context of a global business environment constantly evolving through regulatory, economic and socio-cultural changes. As a leader it’s not enough to merely invest in people in the organization if you are not also willing to ensure the processes they use are optimized for success. So, describe what you do again?
Lead Well!
Monday, October 19, 2009
41% of small businesses are paying their employees…
…just to show up at work!
That is they are not held to any performance standard that somehow ties their paycheck to the results they are responsible for. According to a recent survey released last month by George S. May International 45% of the respondents also indicated their business is not profitable. Why do I mention this survey? Last month I introduced a survey from McKinsey & Company that suggested why larger companies with multiple layers of management might be struggling in this current economic environment. This month I continue the same idea and discussion with smaller businesses (annual revenue between $1M and $200M) as the backdrop.
More specifically, the discussion goes to the critical leadership function, for companies large and small, of successfully setting goals and achieving their desired results. Not only were 45% of the surveyed companies not profitable, the same percentage of companies did not have specific and measurable goals for their employees. This creates a leadership challenge when the correlation is clear between having specific and measurable goals for employees and the impact it has on profitability.
So why do so few businesses have specific and measurable goals for their employees? Again I offer three reasons why this may be the case based on my own experience.
Lack of Vision for the Business – Many small businesses make it up as they go by reacting to the ebb and flow of their specific industry and customer base. However, without a clear direction of where the business is going, as the Cheshire Cat in Alice in Wonderland said, “…any road will take you there”. The view of what the business is doing is typically through the rear view mirror.
Ill-defined Strategy – Strategy reflects the competitive direction of a business. How does the business compete in its industry? An ill-defined strategy creates a scenario where there is little to anchor organizational or individual goals to. The uncertainty of what is happening in the industry and with the competition makes it very difficult to establish SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Reasonably High and Time-Bound) Goals for employees and align them to the business strategy.
Measuring Activities versus Results – Even if a business has established goals tied to an overall strategy, if they can’t measure progress the negative outcome is the same. It is important to ensure the business is tracking and measuring results and not activities and doing so in a manner that yields new knowledge as opposed to restating or repackaging existing information.
How do your goals reflect your business strategy?
Lead Well.
Rick Lochner
That is they are not held to any performance standard that somehow ties their paycheck to the results they are responsible for. According to a recent survey released last month by George S. May International 45% of the respondents also indicated their business is not profitable. Why do I mention this survey? Last month I introduced a survey from McKinsey & Company that suggested why larger companies with multiple layers of management might be struggling in this current economic environment. This month I continue the same idea and discussion with smaller businesses (annual revenue between $1M and $200M) as the backdrop.
More specifically, the discussion goes to the critical leadership function, for companies large and small, of successfully setting goals and achieving their desired results. Not only were 45% of the surveyed companies not profitable, the same percentage of companies did not have specific and measurable goals for their employees. This creates a leadership challenge when the correlation is clear between having specific and measurable goals for employees and the impact it has on profitability.
So why do so few businesses have specific and measurable goals for their employees? Again I offer three reasons why this may be the case based on my own experience.
Lack of Vision for the Business – Many small businesses make it up as they go by reacting to the ebb and flow of their specific industry and customer base. However, without a clear direction of where the business is going, as the Cheshire Cat in Alice in Wonderland said, “…any road will take you there”. The view of what the business is doing is typically through the rear view mirror.
Ill-defined Strategy – Strategy reflects the competitive direction of a business. How does the business compete in its industry? An ill-defined strategy creates a scenario where there is little to anchor organizational or individual goals to. The uncertainty of what is happening in the industry and with the competition makes it very difficult to establish SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Reasonably High and Time-Bound) Goals for employees and align them to the business strategy.
Measuring Activities versus Results – Even if a business has established goals tied to an overall strategy, if they can’t measure progress the negative outcome is the same. It is important to ensure the business is tracking and measuring results and not activities and doing so in a manner that yields new knowledge as opposed to restating or repackaging existing information.
How do your goals reflect your business strategy?
Lead Well.
Rick Lochner
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Leadership is responsible for 94% of quality problems…
…so it is leadership’s responsibility to help people work smarter, not harder.
These words by W. Edwards Deming are a call to action for today’s leaders to help them focus on the right business goals to execute their business strategies. You may recall Deming as the statistician who made popular the Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle and considered the father of modern quality control. It is also relevant we consider his thoughts as today’s leaders address the challenges of achieving their business strategies in an unstable economy, an uncertain regulatory environment and untapped globalization.
Against this backdrop are elements of the alignment process that fall between Strategy and Goals in the Business Alignment Model previously mentioned including last month’s issue. These layers often go unnoticed and unattended by leaders until it is far too late. The focus for this month is the Structure layer of the Business Alignment Model. The Structure layer prompts leaders to look at their People, Processes and Organizational Structure to ensure these elements directly support the prevailing business strategy. This is universally true whether applied to large corporate business models or small or mid-sized entrepreneurial ventures.
Having the right people on your team applies to any employees your business may have, and to the vendors, contractors and suppliers your business uses to execute its strategy. People are viewed on 2 planes – capability and compatibility. Capability addresses their skills and knowledge people bring to your business. Compatibility addresses people’s attitude and their ‘fit’ to your vision and culture and, in many cases, more difficult to assess and measure. As Jim Collins, in his book Good to Great states “…if you begin with the ‘who’, rather than the ‘what’, you can more easily adapt to a changing world”. And we are definitely in a changing world!
Addressing the business processes as part of the structure alignment takes us back to the opening quote. If processes do not align to the core strategy then achieving desired results is next to impossible. And it is up to business leadership to make it happen. As Dr. H. James Harrington stated in his book Business Process Improvement in the section devoted specifically to CEOs “The biggest opportunity you have to improve the bottom line comes from improving your business processes” Again, this may seem as though it is geared towards larger organizations. However, it is just as applicable to medium and small businesses managing their employees, vendors and suppliers as well as non-profit organizations managing their organizations of volunteers and staff. Regardless of venue, leadership can cure 94% of the issues!
Lastly, the organizational infrastructure helps leaders view their current organizational structure to ensure it enables fully capable and compatible people to leverage their core processes to successfully execute the overall business strategy. When the organization is too structured or too loose for the business to run effectively, success gets undermined from within and the business will not meet its goals.
In today’s business environment, regardless of whether you are an entrepreneur or a corporate president/CEO – People, Process and Organizational Structure dictate your business success. Leadership is what ties them to the Strategy and Goals.
Lead Well
Rick Lochner
These words by W. Edwards Deming are a call to action for today’s leaders to help them focus on the right business goals to execute their business strategies. You may recall Deming as the statistician who made popular the Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle and considered the father of modern quality control. It is also relevant we consider his thoughts as today’s leaders address the challenges of achieving their business strategies in an unstable economy, an uncertain regulatory environment and untapped globalization.
Against this backdrop are elements of the alignment process that fall between Strategy and Goals in the Business Alignment Model previously mentioned including last month’s issue. These layers often go unnoticed and unattended by leaders until it is far too late. The focus for this month is the Structure layer of the Business Alignment Model. The Structure layer prompts leaders to look at their People, Processes and Organizational Structure to ensure these elements directly support the prevailing business strategy. This is universally true whether applied to large corporate business models or small or mid-sized entrepreneurial ventures.
Having the right people on your team applies to any employees your business may have, and to the vendors, contractors and suppliers your business uses to execute its strategy. People are viewed on 2 planes – capability and compatibility. Capability addresses their skills and knowledge people bring to your business. Compatibility addresses people’s attitude and their ‘fit’ to your vision and culture and, in many cases, more difficult to assess and measure. As Jim Collins, in his book Good to Great states “…if you begin with the ‘who’, rather than the ‘what’, you can more easily adapt to a changing world”. And we are definitely in a changing world!
Addressing the business processes as part of the structure alignment takes us back to the opening quote. If processes do not align to the core strategy then achieving desired results is next to impossible. And it is up to business leadership to make it happen. As Dr. H. James Harrington stated in his book Business Process Improvement in the section devoted specifically to CEOs “The biggest opportunity you have to improve the bottom line comes from improving your business processes” Again, this may seem as though it is geared towards larger organizations. However, it is just as applicable to medium and small businesses managing their employees, vendors and suppliers as well as non-profit organizations managing their organizations of volunteers and staff. Regardless of venue, leadership can cure 94% of the issues!
Lastly, the organizational infrastructure helps leaders view their current organizational structure to ensure it enables fully capable and compatible people to leverage their core processes to successfully execute the overall business strategy. When the organization is too structured or too loose for the business to run effectively, success gets undermined from within and the business will not meet its goals.
In today’s business environment, regardless of whether you are an entrepreneur or a corporate president/CEO – People, Process and Organizational Structure dictate your business success. Leadership is what ties them to the Strategy and Goals.
Lead Well
Rick Lochner
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
